MadMup.com
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
About Me
My EmailMy Forum
My Music
My Pictures
My Space
My Store
My Tube
My Webcam Archive
Some Favorite Posts
- Advice From Chocolate
- Continuing A Theme
- Inukshuk
- Like Me, Dang It!
- Peace of Cake
- R-E-S-P-E-C-T
- R.I.P. Zumba
- A Shared Moment
- Snakes on a Plane
- Viva la Revolución!
- Worthwhile
- Zen & the Art of Hard Drive Maintenance
Archives
- April 2003
- May 2003
- June 2003
- July 2003
- August 2003
- September 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- March 2010

Tuesday, January 20, 2004
*shudder*
A good friend of mine recommended the movie Alive to me and I just finished watching it. Are you familiar with this movie? It's a true story about a rugby team flying to Chile to compete in a match in 1972. The plane crashes. In the Andes Mountains. And no one rescues them until 71 days after they crashed. Sixteen people out of 45 or so survived.
Did I mention that the survivors ate people to help them survive?
I remember this movie causing quite a bit of controversy when it was released - "They eat people!!!" was the common argument as to why the movie was bad. Granted, it'll be a long time before I eat shredded ham again, but if the people ate people and this is a true story, I'm guessing that's kind of important to the story.
But it is nasty.
I have a hard time keeping track of people in movies. I don't recognize faces well without repeated viewings and interaction, so a two-hour movie hardly gets the job done for me. If a person is famous and I've seen them in things before, I have a better time of it. The only person I recognized in this movie was Ethan Hawke. Well, and Illeana Douglas, but that's because she guested on Seinfeld once. Everyone else all kind of looked the same to me. When someone else would die and it was supposed to be emotional because we had just seen them do that one thing, you know? I wouldn't be too upset by it because I couldn't keep them straight. Most of them had pretty good beards going after that long, and that didn't help me any. Everyone, that is, except Ethan. For some reason he never got a full beard. He just had that little scruffy sorta-mustache and sorta-goatee that you always see him with. Either he was shaving out there or his character couldn't grow a full beard, I don't know which.
Anyway, everything turns out okay - for 16 people anyway. Of course, we don't get to see them back in society, going to restaurants, and playing rugby, so we don't know how they handled all that. Not very well, I would imagine.
There were two documentaries on the DVD. One was 52 minutes long, and I didn't feel like investing another hour in the story tonight, so I didn't watch that one. I did watch the 12 minute one chronicling the main character's return trip to the site 30 years later. That was kind of interesting. I think Ethan should have gone with him, but I'm sure he was very busy.
Anyway, it was a good movie. Thought-provoking. See it once if you haven't, but don't plan on serving snacks during the movie.
Did I mention that the survivors ate people to help them survive?
I remember this movie causing quite a bit of controversy when it was released - "They eat people!!!" was the common argument as to why the movie was bad. Granted, it'll be a long time before I eat shredded ham again, but if the people ate people and this is a true story, I'm guessing that's kind of important to the story.
But it is nasty.
I have a hard time keeping track of people in movies. I don't recognize faces well without repeated viewings and interaction, so a two-hour movie hardly gets the job done for me. If a person is famous and I've seen them in things before, I have a better time of it. The only person I recognized in this movie was Ethan Hawke. Well, and Illeana Douglas, but that's because she guested on Seinfeld once. Everyone else all kind of looked the same to me. When someone else would die and it was supposed to be emotional because we had just seen them do that one thing, you know? I wouldn't be too upset by it because I couldn't keep them straight. Most of them had pretty good beards going after that long, and that didn't help me any. Everyone, that is, except Ethan. For some reason he never got a full beard. He just had that little scruffy sorta-mustache and sorta-goatee that you always see him with. Either he was shaving out there or his character couldn't grow a full beard, I don't know which.
Anyway, everything turns out okay - for 16 people anyway. Of course, we don't get to see them back in society, going to restaurants, and playing rugby, so we don't know how they handled all that. Not very well, I would imagine.
There were two documentaries on the DVD. One was 52 minutes long, and I didn't feel like investing another hour in the story tonight, so I didn't watch that one. I did watch the 12 minute one chronicling the main character's return trip to the site 30 years later. That was kind of interesting. I think Ethan should have gone with him, but I'm sure he was very busy.
Anyway, it was a good movie. Thought-provoking. See it once if you haven't, but don't plan on serving snacks during the movie.
Labels: Seinfeld
Comments:
Post a Comment

Click Pic for Full Size, Comments, & Archives
Movie Journal
- (2010): 6
- (2009): 221
- (2008): 241
- (2007): 107
- (2006): 371
- (2005): 263
Blogs I Read
- Cathartic Ink
- Cremes
- Cynical Rantings
- Gret Reads 24/7
- Jim Gibbon.com
- Life in Idle
- Living By Faith
- Living Intelligently
- The O-Files
- Pixxelations.net
- RandomThink.net
- Smoothie King
- The Tiffinian
- Waltzian Heresies
Comics I Read
- Dilbert
- FoxTrot
- Get Fuzzy
- Joe Loves Crappy Movies
- Pearls Before Swine
- PvP
- Real Life
- Theater Hopper
- White Bread & Toast